glun2b (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Glun2b, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 158 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/21920+1+ap/pmc13049083-54-0-8?v=Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 158 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "HMGCS2-dependent β-OHB/H3K9bhb ameliorates synaptic plasticity and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease"
Article Title: HMGCS2-dependent β-OHB/H3K9bhb ameliorates synaptic plasticity and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease
Journal: Experimental & Molecular Medicine
doi: 10.1038/s12276-026-01664-9
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , The representative immunoblots ( a ) and quantitative analyses ( b ) of Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B and Syn1 in the hippocampus of the WT, 3xTg-AD and 3xTg-AD+β-OHB mice, n = 4 per group. c , RT–qPCR assays mRNA expression of the Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B and Syn1 in the hippocampus of the WT, 3xTg-AD and 3xTg-AD+β-OHB mice, n = 5 per group. d , ChIP–qPCR analysis of the enrichment of H3K9bhb at Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B, Glun2C and Syn1 promoters in the hippocampus of the WT, 3xTg-AD and 3xTg-AD+β-OHB mice, n = 5 per group. e , f , Supplementing with β-OHB could increase the density of 3xTg-AD dendritic spines detected by Golgi-cox staining; the representative images ( e ) and quantitative analysis ( f ) of spine, n = 5 per group, three fields per mice. Scale bar, 5 μm. g – j , The Sholl analysis showed the synaptic complexity of neurons after supplementing with β-OHB in 3xTg-AD mice; the representative images ( g and i ) and the quantitative analysis ( h and j ), n = 5 per group, two fields per mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for b – d and f . Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for i and k . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, ChIP-qPCR, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: a – c , The HMGCS2 upregulation promotes the protein ( a and b ) and mRNA ( c ) expression of H3K9bhb, Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B, Syn1 and PSD95, n = 4 or 5 per group. d , e , ChIP–qPCR analyses of the enrichment of H3K9bhb at Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B and Syn1 promoters in the primary neurons of the WT, 3xTg-AD and 3xTg-AD + HMGCS2 mice n = 5 per group ( d ) and representative gel images from ChIP–qPCR assays ( e ). f – j , The HMGCS2 upregulation promotes the expression of Syn1 (scale bar, 25 μm) ( f ); n = 10 cells per group in MAP2 immunofluorescence ( g ) and quantitative analysis ( h ), n = 10 cells per group and SYP ( i and j ), n = 10 cells per group, scale bar, 15 μm. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for b – d and j . Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for h . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 , *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Expressing, ChIP-qPCR, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , A western blot analysis ( a ) of hippocampal lysates shows that HMGCS2 upregulation increases the protein levels ( b ) of H3K9bhb, Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B, Syn1 and PSD95, n = 3 per group. c , The ChIP–qPCR analysis of H3K9bhb enrichment at the promoters of Glun2A , Glun2B , Syn1 and PSD95 in the four groups, n = 5 per group. d , The mRNA levels of Glun1, Glun2A, Glun2B, Syn1 and PSD95 in the hippocampus, as determined by RT–qPCR, n = 5 per group. e , f , Golgi staining reveals increased dendritic spine density in 3xTg-AD mice following overexpression of HMGCS2; representative images ( e ) and quantification ( f ) are shown, n = 5 per group, three fields per mice. Scale bar, 5 μm. g – j , A behavioral assessment of spatial learning and memory using the MWM, NOR and contextual fear conditioning tests: area under the curve (AUC) of escape latency during MWM training of day 1–6 ( g ), escape latency on day 7 of the MWM test ( h ), NOR discrimination index ( i ), freezing time on day 7 in the contextual fear conditioning test ( j ), n = 8 per group. Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test for b – d , f and g – j . * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 , *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, ChIP-qPCR, Quantitative RT-PCR, Staining, Over Expression